See hard times ahead? Have some hope.

There are good reasons to be hopeful.

First, don’t overstate the claim of a mandate. Consider the numbers. As this is written, the tally is 78.5 million votes for Donald Trump (49.9%) and 76.2 million votes for Kamala Harris (48.4%). That’s the closest victory since Richard Nixon defeated Hubert Humphrey in 1968 by 0.7%.

And, again, more than 76 million Americans didn’t vote for Trump (even more if the 2.6 million votes for others are included).

Nevertheless, some venting can be healthy:

* “A massive number of people across the nation did not find it disqualifying a candidate is a convicted criminal [who] spews racist and sexist rhetoric, spreads lies and conspiracies, and wants to punish his political enemies. And I know I am leaving some things out.” – Lynn Sweet, Chicago Sun-Times

* “Among the many disappointments is knowing that all of his crimes, lies, gaslighting, narcissism, bigotry and greed weren’t punished on Election Day, but rewarded. Bad guys aren’t supposed to win, and he is without question a bad guy.” – conservative columnist S.E. Cupp

* “It is a disastrous revelation about what the United States really is, as opposed to the country that so many hoped that it could be. A convicted felon, a chronic liar who mismanaged a deadly once-in-a-century pandemic, who tried to overturn the last election and unleashed a violent mob on the nation’s Capitol, who calls America ‘a garbage can for the world,’ and who threatens retribution against his political enemies could win.” – Susan B. Glasser, The New Yorker

* “The nation witnessed a vast and majestic spectacle: the American people participating in a democratic election to strike a blow against democracy. Enjoying the powers entrusted to them by the Constitution of the United States, they elected a man to be president who is no more willing to abide by it than he is to shave his head.” – Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune

* “We all deserve a moment to curl up in the fetal position. But when that moment is over, I want to do what I can to make life better for my children and grandchildren (not to mention people I don’t happen to be related to). Remaining silent and surrendering to despair is exactly what fascists want us to do. So let’s not.” – humorist Andy Borowitz

* “Setbacks are unavoidable, but giving up is unforgivable. We all get knocked down, but the measure of our character – as my dad would say – is how quickly we get back up.” – President Joe Biden

* “The election of Donald Trump is a gut punch for Americans committed to unity, equality and workers’ rights. Eight years ago when he was first elected, many of us were paralyzed by our grief over the direction of this country. As we face those same emotions today, we cannot let our grief hold us back from action. We know Trump’s playbook; we can and we will organize to defeat it.” - Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO President April Sims and Secretary Treasurer Cherika Carter

* “Here’s what we know: We don’t really know anything, and that we’re going to come out of this election and we are going to make all kind of pronouncements about what this country is and what this world is, and the truth is, we’re not really going to know shit, and we’re going to make it seem like this is the finality of our civilization. And this is the thing — we are all going to have to wake up tomorrow morning and work like hell to move the world to the place that we prefer it to be.” – comic Jon Stewart

* “You can’t despair, Because that’s what they want. They want you to think that it’s hopeless. It’s never hopeless.”  - Timothy Snyder, Yale professor and author of On Tyranny: 20 Lessons from the 20^th Century

I lived in Washington, D.C., in 1984 during a campaign that resulted in a genuine landslide: Ronald Reagan beat Walter Mondale 58.8% to 37.5%. Even then, with the Iran-Contra scandal brewing and 3.8% inflation almost twice the Federal Reserve’s goal, Democrats retook control of Congress two years later.

Retaining democracy and recovering progress aren’t inevitable. It can be difficult.

A few final quotes:

* (This exchange is about baseball, but it can apply to opposing authoritarians)

“It just got too hard,” said a player thinking of giving up.

A one-time all-star and manager replied, “It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard is what makes it great.”

* “It’s time to think up ideas to implement the sign on the Oregon AFL-CIO’s wall during Trump’s first term: ‘Resist. Persist. Repeat’.”

* Finally, the inspiring advice from lifelong activist John Lewis, a civil rights champion, friend of labor and Congressman –

“Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble.”

Public media need more funding from gov’t, less from corporations - plus better governance and imagination: new report and critics

Days after Peoria's WCBU-FM 89.9’s October fund-raising drive missed its goal, the Community Word reached out to Peoria’s public radio and public television operations for responses to a recent report about the financial state of public media and the difficulties there.

Public media is increasingly relevant at a time of fewer newspapers and smaller staffs, but funding is inadequate, according to the newest report from the Center for Study of Responsive Law, which asserts that funding has become so insufficient in supporting local news reporting that it needs an overhaul.

The report – subtitled “The Case for a Democratically Funded and Locally Rooted News Media

in an Era of Newsroom Closures” – was written by researcher Michael Swerdlow. It says that National Public Radio (NPR), the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB, which helps fund PBS), and local public stations are failing short in their missions as established by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967.

In fact, National Public Radio’s first program director, Bill Siemering, in 1970 said, “National Public Radio will not regard its audience as a ‘market’ or in terms of disposable income…”

Since, however, an increasing challenge to compensate for inadequate and uncertain funding has led to a reliance on wealthy donors and corporations, whose legal duty is to generate profits for shareholders, not to help provide people with high-quality journalism and cultural features. That’s a built-in conflict, if usually benign or beneath the surface.

Public media has “become a ‘market,’ with all that such commercialization entails for its programming priorities and biases, Swerdlow writes.

In an introduction to the 84-page study, longtime consumer advocate Ralph Nader writes that since the late 1960s, “things only got more commercial, profit-driven, and violative of the Communications Act of 1934 standard of providing for the ‘public interest, convenience and necessity’ information needs of viewers and listeners.

“Our report is designed to spark support to return public media to its original public-interest mission and decrease corporate domination on its national and local station Boards of Directors. We’re trying to provoke some discussion. [Public media] need to be shaken up. They live in fear: fear of losing money, fear of the lobbies.”

There have been several similar studies in recent years, from the Nieman Foundation in 2019 and 2023, to last year’s collaborative study from a group of public-media stations, to this year’s effort from the CDP (Contributor Development Partnership).

WCBU Executive Director/General Manager R.C. McBride replies, “I’m all for ideas, and more importantly, actual advances.

 “As for this specific paper, I have some nits to pick,” adds McBride, who’s also GM at WGLT in Normal, “but it’s probably not worth it since I have no doubt it’s an earnest offering from well-intentioned, smart people.”

The new report recommends several reforms:

* adequate and stable funding; “Congress could make funding for journalism part of mandatory spending,” Swerdlow writes, suggesting that funding be “authorized on an indefinite basis” like Social Security and Medicare,’

* representative governance boards,

* information transparency, and

* public deliberations about communities’ news and informational needs.

 

An outside voice with roots in public TV stressed the latter – what’s on the air.

“I get it: Audiences are dwindling, membership is down, and every station leader faces enormous challenges in simply maintaining what they’re doing today,” comments Tom Davidson, a former reporter and manager at PBS and other news organizations.

“I am not suggesting that we should all drop everything we’re doing to chase after foundation dollars,” he said. “I am suggesting that maybe it’s time to admit that what we’ve already done isn’t really helping fix the local-news crisis.

“Being the fourth microphone on a podium at a mayor’s press conference isn’t filling gaps,” he says. “Regurgitating a non-profit’s news release into a 40-second reader isn’t covering under-served communities. And pleading for cash to slightly grow our traditional coverage isn’t digital innovation. Re-imagine instead of muddling through.”

Swerdlow connects the loss of newspapers and journalists in all media in the last 20 years to the effect on civic life, and he details the extent of the lack of government support.

 “Democracy in the United States requires an informed citizenry,” Swerdlow says. “Factual, verified information and news analysis are its lifeblood. National Public Radio and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting face financial and governance challenges that leave them unable to fill the void.”

The United States funds its public media at a much lower rate than peer countries, the report shows.

“The United States spends $3 per person, New Zealand spends $21, Canada spends $33, Australia $53, Japan spends $67, the U.K. spends $97, and Germany spends 41 times more at $124.46,” the report states.

The report compares where public media fit within the federal budget.

“The U.S. spends about $50 million more a year on our 136 military marching bands than the entire public broadcasting system,” Swerdlow writes.

Currently a political pinata “deprived of adequate public funding as a result of Republican antagonism and Democratic acquiescence,” boosting government funding could be problematic. As much of a concern with conflicts of interest with corporate underwriters is a potential conflict between public media’s independence and a greater dependence on government funding.

WTVP-TV 47 President and CEO Jenn Gordon says, “I would welcome an increase in government funding as certainly it would strengthen the stability of the station. However, it doesn't follow that the other sources of revenue like corporate support, member donations and fundraising activities should take a back seat. I think it would be dangerous if they ever did regardless of any increase of government funding.

“The CPB was founded on the private/public funding model. Both sources are incredibly important and neither one should be devalued at the expense of overemphasizing the other. I do think an increase in government funding could meaningfully improve the news-desert crisis happening in nearly every small to mid-sized station in the country.”

Gordon also takes issue with the possibility that some financial backers could pose conflicts with content or operations.

“I disregard the notion that corporate support and private funding innately puts the organization at risk for compromising their ability to remain unbiased,” she said. “Solid leaders stick to the mission and are willing to forego any private funding sources that come with a series of demands. Yes, there are going to be times when private donations shrink. And there will be seasons when they boom. Bottom line, both are important and essential.”

McBride, who’s also a member of NPR’s Board of Directors, also values a wide funding scope.

“I think public media is best served by a model that combines funding from a variety of sources: local businesses, individual donors of all sizes, government appropriations and grants, corporate support, and foundation grants and gifts. In other words, what exists now,” he says. “That said, it is clear we need to grow revenue to do what’s being increasingly asked of public media. The percentage of local journalists working for public media has never been higher and that trend will continue. All the luck in the world to journalists still working in commercial media, but there just aren’t enough of them.”

Truth or consequences: Will deporting immigrants – costly, harmful, inhumane – remain on the nation’s agenda?

The issue of deporting immigrants may seem moot, depending on the results from the Nov. 5 election, but the campaign focusing on “the Other” – minorities, childless women, asylum seekers and other immigrants, legal Haitian transplants recruited to work in Ohio, etc. – could have normalized the idea of deportation for the future.

After all, deportations have happened, if at smaller scale than Donald Trump promised. President Obama’s administration in 2019 removed more than 400,000 people through immigration orders, and the Eisenhower administration in 1954 carried out “Operation Wetback,” using a slur to signal the targets, and deporting more than 1 million of them.

Trump proposed a project 10 times as large, and many U.S. citizens apparently think that’s acceptable, believing exaggerations and lies. (A recent visit to Aurora, Colo., showed how false and foolish Trump’s claim was that Venezuelan gangs were running rampant through the Denver suburb. Aurora’s Republican Mayor, former Congressman Mike Coffman, said the former President’s statements were “overstated claims fueled by social media and through select news organizations.”)

Trump’s plan –- a terrible, possible blueprint someday – was to have the military, National Guard units from states with compliant governors, state and local police, and “10 to 11,000 guns and badges,” as Trump’s hardline immigration adviser Stephen Miller said, from the FBI, DEA, ATF, even the National Park Service, costing about $88 billion, the American Immigration Council says. The feds would use the Alien Enemies Act, notorious for its incarcerating thousands of law-abiding Japanese Americans during World War II (for which the United States has apologized and paid its victims).

Miller – who recently said, “They are so evil. They are not your run-of-the-mill criminal. They are people that are Satanic. They are involved in human sacrifice” – also proposes building huge detention camps.

Trump’s rhetoric is specific and violent. “Getting them out will be a bloody story,” he said at a September rally.

“Two former officials who handled immigration issues for then-President Donald Trump say that a ‘whole of government’ approach costing billions would be needed,” reports NBC News, which noted that, “The most recent government estimate [from the Dept. of Homeland Security] is that just under 11 million unauthorized immigrants resided in the U.S., down from the 2010 total of 11.6 million.”

So: Trump’s set a standard, influencing the GOP’s platform, which pledges to “Begin largest deportation program in American history… The Republican Party is committed to sending illegal aliens back home.”

NBC added, “Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, ‘On day one back in the White House, President Trump will begin the largest criminal deportation operation of illegal immigrants’.”

Journalist Radley Balko offered a highly detailed analysis of the logistical complexities of the scheme [see https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/trumps-deportation-army ]. He estimates such a force would exceed the number of active-duty U.S. Army troops, detaining a population at least twice that of New York City, and need thousands of flights.

 

BUILT ON B.S.

The disinformation stoking unfounded fear and acquiescence by many people who should know better follow a playbook used against Asians, Irish, southern Europeans, Catholics and Jews for centuries: criminals, dirty, diseased, weird, and those who take from society without adding anything.

Neil Steinberg in the Chicago Sun-Times received one screed from someone who’d accepts the lies:

“They are Raping, Murdering, Child Trafficking, Selling Drugs, Stealing, Beating, Robbing, Abusing American Citizens, Our Hospitals, Schools, Eating Our Pets, Taking Away Benefits from Veterans…”

(The reader forgot the false accusations that immigrants somehow took aid intended for disaster victims and registered to vote.)

In reality, immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than the native-born, according to a Stanford University study of more than a century of data. And they don’t take benefits or jobs from others. Trump’s said, “Virtually 100% of the new jobs under Biden have also gone to illegal aliens,” a remark so ridiculous it took a CNN fact check to clarify that at most 800,000 immigrants gained employment out of 3.1 million jobs created.

 

GIVING MORE THAN TAKING

Immigrants fill job vacancies.

Moody’s Analytics said immigrants help cope with labor shortages, especially in education/health care, leisure/hospitality, construction and agriculture. Some 950,000 farmworkers (45%) are undocumented, reports farm columnist Alan Guebert.

“Immigrants are already filling [the labor] gap, and if we have mass deportations where millions of immigrants are torn from their family members and the country they have made home, we will not only have the human impact of this but we’ll have a severe effect on the economy and available workforce,” said Dr. Jackie Vimo of the National Immigration Law Center.

A study based on an analysis of deportations that occurred during the Obama-era “Secure Communities” program, for example, indicates 88,000 U.S.-born workers would lose jobs for every 1 million unauthorized immigrants deported.

“The vast economic research on this question,” said Yale University professor Natasha Sarin, is in a mass deportation “GDP would actually fall and inflation would rise.”

“We’re doctors, chefs, librarians, construction workers, lawyers, drivers, scientists and business owners,” says Alliyah Lusuegro, Outreach Coordinator for the National Priorities Project. “We fill labor shortages and help keep inflation down. We contribute nearly $100 billion each year to federal, state and local taxes.”

Immigrants pay more taxes than they receive in tax-funded services.

They contribute more than their share toward public services: $96.7 billion in total taxes, including $59.4 billion in federal taxes and $37.3 billion to state and local governments, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP). And in 40 states, unauthorized immigrants paid higher tax rates than the top 1% of the income scale there.

Six states each receive at least $1 billion from undocumented immigrants working there: Illinois, California, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Texas. A study from the American Immigration Council last month broke down data for Illinois:

* Immigrant households in Illinois paid $24.3 billion in taxes in 2022 alone, including $7.8 billion in contributions to Social Security and $2.1 billion to Medicare.

* Immigrant entrepreneurs are driving prosperity in the state. Illinois is home to 19 Fortune 500 companies that were started by immigrants or children of immigrants. In total, 25.5% of all entrepreneurs in the state are immigrants; generating a total business income of $3.2 billion.

* Immigrants fill labor shortage gaps, especially in health care. Of Illinois' 102 counties, 82 lack sufficient health-care professionals, and the state faces a projected deficit of 6,200 physicians by 2030. Immigrants with international health degrees can help address this deficit, but many face challenges in overcoming licensing barriers before they can get their credentials to practice medicine and provide care. Currently, 18.7% of all nurses in Illinois are foreign-born; as are 19 percent of health aides.

 

“At the end of the day, they’re just normal people paying normal taxes,” said Richard C. Auxier, with  the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “There are tons of laws that prevent undocumented workers from getting benefits.”

Immigrants help pay for programs for which they’re ineligible.

ITEP shows that unauthorized immigrants contribute $25.7 billion to Social Security, and $6 billion to Medicare, just two of the programs they cannot use.

“No one can get a Social Security benefit unless he or she has worked and paid Social Security taxes — or unless he or she is the spouse or child of someone who has,” said Tom Margenau, a longtime Social Security public information officer. “No one can get any Social Security benefits if they are living in this country illegally.”

 

CONSEQUENCES

What would happen if the federal government under any administration deported millions?

“If a mass deportation and detention system ends up being established by a future administration, we have many concerns about how that could impact the civil rights and civil liberties of immigrants,” said Kyle Virgien, senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s National Prison Project.

The results would be catastrophic for U.S. citizens, too.

“According to economists, labor groups, and immigration advocates, mass deportations threaten the economy and disrupt the U.S. food supply chain,” report Frida Garza and Ayurella Horn-Muller of Grist.

Bloomberg writer Clive Crook added, “Deportations shrink both aggregate supply and aggregate demand. (Desirable as it might be to repair the country’s dysfunctional immigration rules, unauthorized immigrants still add to the labor force, demand goods and services, and contribute to the public purse.)”

A reminder: Even before his nomination, Trump in February ordered Republicans in Congress to kill the bipartisan immigration reform.

And a last word, from conservative columnist Mona Charen: “Immigrants are vital to our economy. They will contribute an estimated $7 trillion to our GDP over the next 10 years. We must not lose sight of the fact that being a magnet for those who want a better life is an American strength, not a weakness.”

Maintaining election integrity never easy. Threats make it more complicated

If you liked January 6, 2021, you might love January 6, 2025.

That riot some 50 months ago assaulted 250 police officers (injuring 174), had seven fatalities, damaged the Capitol (costing more than $2 billion), and led to 1,488 people being charged (with 749 convicted and 467 imprisoned). Urged by Trump, thousands bolstered by the Proud Boys and other extremist groups, some armed, gathered around the Capitol, broke through police lines, and threatened lawmakers and Vice President Mike Pence.

It was the worst attack on the U.S. government since the British burned down the White House in the War of 1812.

The motivation for that insurrection spurred on by Trump drew upon the Big Lie that his defeat came from voter fraud and also from Americans who accepted the conspiracy (debunked by almost 100 state and federal court cases that rejected election challenges because there was no proof)

The lie still lives. People who embrace the falsehood remain. Some are threatening election authorities.

The nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice’s recent survey showed that 38% of local election officials have experienced harassment and threats for doing their job, and more than half are worried about safety for themselves and colleagues.

Of course, people using threats to question the U.S. election system aren’t helping authorities ensure its accuracy.

Since the 2020 election, when Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump, 81 million to 74 million (306 Electoral College votes to 232), there’s been an unprecedented increase in threats to election authorities nationwide.

The hostility, directed against federal, state and local officials, has included violent rhetoric and even gunshots at the homes of election officials (in New Mexico), threats to harm or kill election authorities (Arizona), threatening election workers at a polling place (Florida), texting violent threats to a member of a Board of Canvassers (Michigan), and envelopes with a return address of U.S. Traitor Elimination Army (USTEA) received at various offices, containing a white powder, some of which were laced with fentanyl, according to the FBI.

In Central Illinois, Peoria Election Commission Executive Director Elizabeth Gannon says the possibility of such attacks is less of a disruption than a nuisance.

“It’s emboldened attackers,” she said, noting that her office hasn’t received the USTEA envelopes. “That doesn’t mean there aren’t bad actors.”

So she and her staff are preparing for the worst, participating in exercises organized by state County Clerks, meeting with the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, part of Homeland Security – which has issued a warning about calls for violence -- plus local officials ranging from the Sheriff and Emergency Management to IT experts.

“I wouldn’t say we’re intimidated,” she continued. “We’re hyper-aware. It’s in the backs of our minds. So we’ve taken precautionary measures.”

Conservative columnist S.E. Cupp wrote about elections’ “New Normal” –

“All this to protect her from … what? From whom? Terrorists? Assassins? Gangsters? Criminals?

“No. All this is to protect her from election deniers.”

Why threaten or try to intimidate neighbors? Partly, Trump is determined to regain office, and his base dutifully follows him, despite his almost desperate zeal for power, possibly to pardon himself for his conviction of violating campaign laws or escape prosecution for illegally retaining classified documents or engineering the 2021 insurrection.

Before Nov. 6, an overall goal is to discourage or suppress turnout, sow doubt about the country’s system, force litigation, and ultimately challenge certification by Congress. After the Capitol was cleared on January 6 and Congress resumed business, 147 lawmakers 50 months ago succumbed to pressure and voted to overturn the U.S. election – 139 Members of the House of Representatives 8 Senators, according to the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives.

The House could still hold its slim majority this January.

“Such efforts to derail democracy are exactly what our adversaries who oppose democracy desire,” said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research. “And it appears those that oppose American democracy are preparing to use this tactic in November, if their preferred candidate loses.”

Also not helping election authorities do their jobs – in fact hurting the process – is disinformation, a raging waterfall of sewage shared online and from telecasts and the “bully pulpit” (an apt description of a Trump rally, perhaps).

A common complaint from deniers is the trustworthiness of voting equipment since it’s connected to the internet.

Except it’s not, said Gannon.

“We have paper ballots ever since we replaced our outdated system, from 2006,” she said. “This will be the fifth election using paper ballots. Neither the polling places nor early results are online.”

The process is thorough, she said: Preliminary counts result in unofficial totals, a canvass that can take a couple of weeks yields an official total, followed by a re-tabulation by the State Board of Elections before the count is certified – all with a paper trail if verifications are needed.

Disinformation is getting so extreme it borders on comedy. U.S. Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) this month said hurricane Helene was manipulated by Democratic weather-control technology to steer the storm to Republican areas, which is like calling Dolly Parton’s $1 million donation to relief efforts a PR stunt.

Republican North Carolina State Sen. Kevin Corbin begged people to “help STOP this conspiracy theory junk that is floating all over Facebook and the internet about the floods in WNC.”

John Dixon Keller, principal deputy chief of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, said the DOJ is already prosecuting and investigating threats against election workers.

“It threatens the foundation of our democracy.,” he said. “Threats do not contribute to the marketplace of ideas. They are condemnable, criminal acts. Death threats are criminal, and they will be prosecuted.”

Indeed, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said, “The nature of these threats is some type of communication, either implicit or explicit, directing a threat of unlawful violence to a member of the election community. It could be an election worker, an election official or a state or local candidate.”

A majority of Americans are alarmed. Two-thirds of Americans think Trump won’t accept the results, according to an ABC News/Ipsos poll. A similar percentage fear violence if voters choose Kamala Harris.

Campaigning, Trump has vowed to prosecute “lawyers, political operatives, donors, illegal voters and corrupt election officials,” and just last month he:

* said he’d challenge absentee ballots from military or overseas voters,

* told Right-wing internet host Tucker Carlson that 20% of mail-in ballots will be fraudulent, and

* claimed, without evidence, that “tens of thousands” of undocumented immigrants have registered to vote.

 

“The poison doesn’t begin or end with Trump,” writes Berkeley professor and former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich. “It includes a Republican vice presidential candidate who calls women who choose not to have children ‘childless cat ladies,’ claims Haitian immigrants are eating people’s pets, won’t concede that Trump lost the 2020 election, and won’t commit to be bound by the outcome of the 2024 election.”

Milton Kidd, an Illinois native now an elections and voter registration director in Georgia, told Stateline news service he’s been stalked and received several hate-filled messages threatening him.

“We’ve reshaped this nation into an uglier, vile, vitriolic spirit that we’re just allowing to continue to manifest,” he said. “I will never let a detractor who calls with vile language deter me from the work that I do.”

 

From coast to coast, election deniers plan chaos

In Illinois, the chair of the state Republican Party, Kathy Salvi, vowed to “make sure that every honest vote is counted,” implying they’re not – and sparking longtime Lake County election judge Laurence Schiller to challenge her to prove there’s a problem.

“Either she doesn’t understand how elections are run in Illinois and how difficult it would be to cast fraudulent ballots,” Schiller said, “or she is just another Trump Republican embracing his big lie.”

Elsewhere, malicious actions are happening enough to cause at least a dozen states to enact new protections for election personnel, and some state governments are scrambling to compel local officials to uphold the law and constitution:

* The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reports that at least 239 election deniers have positions of authority in eight swing states.

“Our democracy’s firewalls held fast in 2020, but election deniers and MAGA extremists have spent the last four years infiltrating election administration and political party positions in order to disrupt and cast doubt on the 2024 election results,” said CMD’s Arn Pearson. “While it is highly unlikely that these officials, along with deniers in Congress, will be able to prevent certification of the 2024 election results, they are in a prime position to force litigation and delay what should be a ministerial task while they and their allies whip up false claims of voter fraud, non-citizen voting, and a stolen election.”

* At least 70 U.S. elected officials are election deniers, according to investigative reporter Justin Glawe, including Speaker Mike Johnson.

* State officials in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin say they’ll force local authorities to certify accurate counts.

* Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, said he will ensure counties follow the law and constitution.

* North Carolina’s State Board of Elections removed two members of one county’s election board for refusing to certify a vote.

* In Mississippi, the GOP wants to invalidate ballots if they aren’t cast on Election Day – even if they meet the legal requirement of having been postmarked by Election Day.

* In Michigan, armed protestors demonstrated outside the home of the state’s Secretary of State, and a member of Kalamazoo’s Board of County Commissioners promised to not certify the 2024 election results.

* A host of death threats were made to the Colorado Secretary of State and staff.

* In Washington state, the Secretary of State was threatened.

* In July, a Nevada County Commissioner, Clara Andriola, is such an election denier she refused to certify her own primary election this summer.

'Undecided' working people? Really?

Mere weeks before Election Day, the presidential race seems close, and some people say they remain undecided.

Really.

Labor has rallied behind Harris/Walz, who remind Americans they support unions – and they even pledged to push for passage of the Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act (the PRO Act), which would reform and modernize federal labor law. (Since the bill would also need Congressional approval, that underscores how important down-ballot contests are, too.)

Meanwhile, Republicans Donald Trump, J.D. Vance and today’s Trump-family-dominated GOP have tried to persuade voters that they back working people, too – despite their anti-worker, anti-union past.

Even before Trump’s takeover of the Republican Party, the GOP has warred with workers for decades, opposing the 1930s’ breakthrough National Labor Relations Act, weakening that foundation in Taft-Hartley and other measures, and especially since the Reagan-era breaking of the air traffic controllers union in 1981.

Republican politicians vote against raising the minimum wage but back Right-To-Work laws; support racist, sexist, and anti-voter legislation but oppose maintaining or strengthening child-labor protections; install anti-labor judges and National Labor Relations Board members but try to de-fund government agencies set up to enforce labor laws, safety and health rules, etc.

Most GOP politicians care far less about working people than they do about their business patrons and keeping their cushy jobs while Trump insists they bow to his whims.

Republicans’ latest attempt to persuade union members the GOP has spent decades systematically disenfranchising comes from Trump running mate Vance, the first-term Senator from Ohio. The author, Marine, Ivy League attorney and venture capitalist puts on his working-class past like ladies apply makeup. But it’s understandable why people think it’s “weird” to hear his insulting comments about women, false claims about legal Haitian immigrants, and yarns about his family. (Dude: Let them live their lives.)

“In my view, Vance’s support for workers hinges almost entirely on white Christian nationalism,” writes journalist Kim Kelly, who’s written for Esquire, Teen Vogue and The New Republic.

“He does not want to uplift the U.S. working class in all its vibrant, multiracial, multigender beauty; he wants (white, male, Christian) workers to earn better wages so that their (white, female, Christian) spouses can stay home and raise more (white, Christian) children.”

Not unlike too many spineless Republicans, Vance is a fear mongerer who rejects unity and solidarity by using divisive exaggerations and lies about crime, immigration, prices and so on to appeal to some workers while avoiding policies that actually support everyday Americans.

Regular working people, unionized or not, Kelly wrote, “are 45% Black, Latino and other workers of color; women workers make up half of the overall total, and 8% of workers are disabled, according to Census data from the 2021 American Community Survey (ACS). This doesn’t leave enough room for simplified hate, though, so MAGA Republicans are looking for the next set of suckers to draw into their poisonous embrace.

“The Republicans are trying to make fools of us by pandering to outdated and incorrect stereotypes about who union members are and what the working class is, hoping to turn us against one another by harping on perceived differences — the same way union-busters and grimy bosses have done since the beginning of wage labor. But it won’t work. There are no neutral positions here — and we know which side they’re on.”

In fact, even when Democratic leaders too often take for granted labor and other parts of its base, differences between 21^st century Republicans and Democrats are stark, and Trump so untethered, that an increasing number of unexpected support has emerged to back Kamala Harris.

When Harris’s campaign has been endorsed by a wide range of voices – Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen, ex-Republican hawk and VP Dick Cheney and long-time Peoria Congressman Ray LaHood – the widening of support shouldn’t be surprising. Coming together this month were Harris and former Wyoming Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney at a joint appearance in Wisconsin.

Cheney couldn’t restrain her contempt for Trump, commenting, “He is petty, he is vindictive, and he is cruel, and Donald Trump is not fit to lead this good and great nation.”

She asked voters to “reject the depraved cruelty of Donald Trump.”

There’s also a growing split between traditional Republican supporters and Trump. New York Times Magazine writer Jonathan Mahler wrote, “Most C.E.O.s are not wild about a second Trump term. They had a rocky ride the first time around — though they did get the tax cuts and deregulation they wanted — and they are pretty sure he will bring instability, which is generally bad for business.”

Almost 90 current and former business leaders signed a letter endorsing Harris, and they included James Murdoch from the family owning the Wall Street Journal and Fox, plus entrepreneurs Mark Cuban and Magic Johnson, plus former Treasury Secretaries Michael Blumenthal, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers.

Goldman Sachs warns that the broader economy would get the biggest boost if Democrats win the White House and Congress. Even if Harris wins but Congress is divided, the economy under her administration would mean a 2.1% growth in GDP, an average jobless rate of 4% and inflation of 2.4%, according to Moody’s Analytics – compared to a Trump victory working with a GOP Congress predicted to have lower GDP growth, and higher unemployment and inflation.

JPMorganChase CEO Jamie Dimon – who this month said Trump’s claim that he’d endorsed the Republican was a lie – weeks earlier in a Washington Post commentary called for a return to sanity, advocating for “smarter policies that provide protection, progress and prosperity to all,” including fixing the failure to create equal opportunity for all, expanding the economy by encouraging investments, sharing the wealth, addressing our national debt, maintaining the world’s strongest military, taking control of our borders, strengthening the social safety nets, and renewing national pride by unabashedly teaching civics and American exceptionalism without papering over our mistakes.

“Put country and constitution first,” Dimon said.

His remark foreshadowed Liz Cheney’s remark alongside Harris that this election is about “country over party.”

A new campaign, Business Leaders for Harris, has made the case for the Democratic nominee, saying, “For a stronger economy, we choose Kamala Harris.” (See https://www.bizforharris.org/.)

 “Politics make strange bedfellows,” but never so important as when a strange, weird ticket threatens Americans’ many freedom. Besides “Republicans for Harris,” whose website says “over 100,000 people have joined this campaign within a campaign” (Newsweek- Sept. 5), consider a few other Harris endorsements:

* In a Sept. 18 letter published by the New York Times, 111 former staffers, all Republicans who served in the Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, G.W. Bush and/or Trump administrations or members of Congress, announced they back Harris. They wrote: “Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable”;

* On Sunday, Sept. 22, a letter released by 741 former national security officials – bipartisan senior leaders—endorsed Harris for president, calling Trump “impulsive and ill-informed” (CNBC News); and

* On Sept. 24, 405 economists endorsed Harris (CNBC).

 

Sometimes, for the good of the nation – in the privacy of the voting booth – people must hold their noses and cast ballots for a candidate about whom they’re not enthused. As conservative columnist Mona Charen wrote, “In 1800, Alexander Hamilton faced a similar dilemma. The Electoral College had tied between Thomas Jefferson (Hamilton’s political opposite) and Aaron Burr, a man of no principles. The House of Representatives had to choose, Hamilton lobbied his Federalist friends to vote for Jefferson, explaining that: ‘Mr. Jefferson, though too revolutionary in his n options, is yet a lover of liberty and will be desirous of something like orderly government – Mr. Burr loves nothing but himself – thinks of nothing but his own aggrandizement – and will be content with nothing short of permanent power … in his own hands’.”

The question Nov. 5: Will one-time Trump supporters in organized labor – more than 40% of whom backed him in 2016 and 2020 – weigh the threats to unions and the working class that Trump poses, and join with others who value the country and the constitution?

Feds trying to address tax avoidance

It’s not news that the ultra-rich in the United States take advantage of loopholes, and most Americans suspect that’s a negative impact on the economy. What’s new is that the Treasury Department and Senate Democrats are starting to push for changes that will deal with those who don’t pay their fair share.

Through Dec. 12, the public can comment on the proposed regulations (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/09/13/2024-20089/corporate-alternative-minimum-tax-applicable-after-2022. A hearing is set for Jan. 16.

“The wealthiest Americans continue to use every trick in the book to duck and dodge paying their taxes,” said Lindsey Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative. “It’s unpatriotic. It starves our communities of revenue for needed investments. And it erodes faith in our democracy.”

(Note: “Every trick in the book” means, at least, avoiding taxes can be legal, so tax reform is needed.)

Dealing with tax avoidance is timely since provisions of Trump’s 2017 tax reform are scheduled to expire next year.

Trump brags about his tax cuts, which “permanently” cut corporate tax rates from 35% to 21% (and made slight adjustments for individuals through next year), and he claims vast benefits delivered to everyday Americans. He’s also pledged to “double down”  by continuing and expanding those cuts if elected in November. Specifically, Trump is proposing additional corporate tax cuts, from 21% to 15%, which the Center for American Progress (CAP) says would cost another $1 trillion over 10 years.

However, studies show Trump’s tax reform was a bonanza for the wealthiest corporations and individuals. The benefits did not “trickle down” to most Americans.

“The tax cut was justified with the argument that it would generate so much economic growth and investment and wage growth that low-income Americans would benefit,” says Brendan Duke, senior director for economic policy at CAP Action Fund. “The data is in, and we see no evidence of that. Any wage gains went to executives and the highest paid workers.”

Also, according to the CBO, his tax cut increased deficits by about $1.9 trillion over 11 years.

“The national debt has risen by almost $7.8 trillion during Trump’s time in office,” reported ProPublica’s Allan Sloan in 2021. “That’s nearly twice as much as what Americans owe on student loans, car loans, credit cards and every other type of debt other than mortgages, combined, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

“It amounts to about $23,500 in new federal debt for every person in the country.”

In the first year of Trump’s tax reforms, ExxonMobil received a $6 billion windfall from Trump’s reform, according to Americans for Tax Fairness (AFT). In the second year, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, 91 Fortune 500 companies paid no federal income taxes on their 2018 U.S. income as a result of the tax law.

AFT also reports that 35 U.S. companies paid a negative $1.7 billion between 2018 and 2022, meaning those companies (including Ford, Netflix, T-Mobile and Tesla) together received more money from the U.S. government in refunds than they paid in taxes. During the same five-year period, their CEOs were paid more than their companies’ tax payments.

For its part, Treasury is looking at the role of the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT) and proposing new rules requiring corporations that make $1 billion annual profit to pay at least a 15% minimum tax. Now, such companies pay a federal tax rate of just 2.6% on average, Treasury says.

The consequence of the new rules could mean an estimated $250 billion in additional revenues over the next 10 years.

The change would affect a relatively few corporations, such as Amazon, AT&T, Intel, and Verizon, which now exploit an array of tax credits and deductions to show zero profits.

(Ways the rich escape tax obligations include arranging compensation as something other than a paycheck; manipulating their financial books in “tax-loss harvesting” (which occurs when a wealthy stockholder sells shares at a loss, buys the same amount of another corporation’s stock, and uses the former’s loss to erase much the taxes owed on gains made on the latter); listing personal expenses as business expenses, and making “charitable” contributions for the tax deductions, but controlling the actual use of the donation (so the tax benefits are immediate even if the funds haven’ gone to a good cause yet, if ever).

“The proposed rules are an important step toward realizing Congress’ efforts to address the most egregious U.S. corporate tax avoidance and ensure the largest and most profitable corporations in the country cannot pay little to no taxes,” said Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Again, this isn’t a new issue. Thirteen years ago, the Congressional Research Service said the 2011 U.S. tax system violated “the [billionaire Warren] Buffett rule.” That says that no household making more than $1 million a year should pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle-class families pay. However, that year, the CRS said “roughly a quarter of all millionaires (about 94,500 taxpayers) face a tax rate that is lower than the tax rate faced by 10.4 million moderate-income taxpayers (10% of the moderate-income taxpayers).”

The tax system in the United States is set up for voluntary compliance, so taxpayers (and their tax preparers) calculate what they owe, as opposed to other nations that essentially determine tax obligations and send taxpayers a “bill.”

Democrats are pushing for a corporate-tax increase. Last month, Senate Democrats called out tax avoidance schemes by wealthy individuals, too, arguing that the last update to the tax code by Republicans during the Trump administration amounted to “class warfare.”

“When Congress gets around to looking at Social Security and the housing crisis, it’s going to find that the Trump class warfare has devastated the budget and made it impossible to come together and pass real solutions,” Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said during a September hearing.

COVID 2024: Isn’t it time to get our shot together?

In a year when a U.S. election, foreign wars, local corruption and global climate crises seem like life-and-death matters, there’s another issue.

Life and death.

COVID and health.

Of course, if we’re bored reading about MoPox, EEE or other ailments, maybe we’ve lost a sense of urgency about COVID, which has become endemic – still with us, in some form. COVID changed the world, making Zoom meetings and social distancing familiar, and working from home routine for some jobs.

Somewhere between surrender and pandemic fatigue, we can feel lazy, “sick and tired,” or resentful of instructions we give our own kids: “wash your hands,” “wipe your nose,” “cover your mouth.”

But there can be dire health consequences if we stop obeying our own rules and think the risks are acceptable.

True, some who contract it have few symptoms; it’s an inconvenience. Some have a cough and/or a fever that sidelines them for a week or more. Others, mostly the chronically ill or seniors, are so severely affected they’re hospitalized and can die.

The number of COVID hospitalizations and fatalities has dropped a lot since 2020, and fewer test kits are sought, isolating after infection is sporadic, and masks have almost vanished. However, COVID cases have been surging, too – the virus is found in wastewater throughout the country, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And this summer, the rate of COVID hospitalizations was double that of last summer, and COVID deaths occurred twice as often as in the spring. Then, a Gallup poll showed that 59% of U.S. adults say the pandemic is “over.”

But it’s changing, repeatedly. The COVID virus evolves frequently, so some assume vaccinations will be obsolete by winter anyway But that doesn’t mean we let protection fade.

“New strains have emerged already—in August, KP.3.1.1 became the dominant strain, accounting for 36.8% of cases, according to the CDC’s Nowcast, which provides model-based early estimates,” said Katy Endress, Director of Epidemiology & Clinical Services at the Peoria City/County Health Department. “It has surpassed KP.3 (which overtook KP.2 earlier this summer). However, the new shots will continue to help protect against severe illness even if the virus mutates and additional strains appear.

“COVID-19 vaccines are updated to give you the best protection from the currently circulating strains,” she continued. “Pfizer’s and Moderna’s updated mRNA vaccines were approved in August for everyone ages 12 and older, and each has a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA) for infants and children ages 6 months through 11 years. The mRNA vaccines target a SARS-CoV-2 strain called KP.2.”

Endress says the vaccinations are safe. Before vaccines are made available to everyday people, the FDA assesses findings from clinical trials to ensure they meet the FDA’s safety and effectiveness standards, and the agency keeps working to keep up.

“The FDA also authorized an updated COVID vaccine from Novavax for everyone 12 and older,” Endress said. “That shot targets another strain—JN.1. JN.1 was the dominant strain in May but was surpassed in June by a collection of other Omicron virus strains, including KP.2.”

Unlike other vaccinations the public has long accepted – including MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) and PCV (pneumonia) – COVID vaccinations aren’t yet required for school, and parents getting the shot for their children is fading, according to Chicago pediatrician Scott Goldstein told KFF Health News.

“The most important thing we do, you could argue, is vaccinating kids,” he said.

Yet only about 15% of eligible kids in the United States got the shot last year.

It’s also still vital for high-risk individuals to get the vaccination. Take the shot now.

“Everyone ages 6 months and older should get the 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible,” says Endress, who adds that the vaccination can be part of preparing for winter.

“There is no recommended waiting period between getting a COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines,” she says. “You can get a COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines, including a flu and/or RSV vaccine, at the same visit.”