Bill Knight column for Thurs.,
Fri. or Sat., June 14, 15 or 16, 2018
Decades ago, “Saturday Night Live” featured an
occasional comedy sketch with a fictional retired Major League Baseball player
from the Dominican Republic, Chico Escuela (Garrett Morris), responding to
almost every question in his limited English, saying, “Baseball ... been berra
berra good ... to me.”
In 2018, it seems that the baseballs themselves have
been very, very good to batters.
As the National Pastime next month has its 89th
All-Star Game July 17, followed 10 days later by the National Baseball Hall of
Fame weekend, fans and sportswriters, owners and players may be second-guessing
batters’ home-run achievements – but also past condemnations of “inflated”
home-run statistics.
Baseballs actually have been getting extra lift for at
least a few years, and it's not from the celebrated “launch angles” of
sluggers’ swings, new research says.
Major League Baseball’s average of home runs per game (for
both teams combined) climbed from 1.90 before the 2015 All-Star break to 2.17
in the second half, then increased to 2.31 in 2016 and a record 2.51 last year.
So far this season, with about 40 percent of games played (many in chilly
weather), the 30 MLB teams average 1.14 home runs per game, according to MLB
stats, with the Yankees leading with 1.67 HR/G and Marlins just 0.75 HR/G.
Therefore, a game between, say the Cubs (1.06 HR/G) and Cardinals (1.22 HR/G) results
in a 2.28 pace, and that’s sure to increase with warmer temperatures.
The study’s 10-person committee included experts in math,
mechanical engineering, physics and statistics, but they couldn’t definitively
determine a cause.
“The aerodynamic properties of the ball have changed,
allowing it to carry farther," said committee chair Alan Nathan, professor
emeritus of physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
“We have to admit that we do not understand it,” he
told the Associated Press. “We know the primary cause is the change in the drag,
but we just simply cannot pinpoint what feature of the ball would lead to it. It
was probably something very, very subtle in the manufacturing process. If it
weren't, we would have found it.”
In response, MLB said it’s taking five small steps to
examine the integrity of the baseball – and the game:
* update production specifications with Rawlings and
add specs for aerodynamic properties;
* develop aerodynamic tests;
* monitor temperature and humidors is necessary;
* create standards for using the traditional Lena
Blackburne Rubbing Mud from New Jersey, for umpires to enforce; and
* form a scientific advisory council.
MLB
didn’t resort to an exhaustive study of home runs during the Decade of Doping,
roughly 1993-2003. A few independent commentators have, notably data analyst
Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight.com, which “documented the home-run surge in
detail last year, testing every hypothesis for its cause, including weather,
performance-enhancing drugs, and the fly-ball revolution. Each theory was
rejected, leaving a solid trail of statistics that only a change in the ball
would seem to explain.”
Instead,
owners, sportswriters and fans all assumed Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy
Sosa, et. al., using Performance Enhancing Drugs was the cause. But it’s now
feasible that – even if the players were “juiced” – so were the baseballs.
Also,
MLB’s league expansion diluted the pool of good pitchers, weakening what
batters faced. Plus – as anyone watching pitches hit catchers’ mitts from a
center-field camera perspective – MLB umpires flat ignore the book’s Rule 2.00:
“The strike zone is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a
horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of
the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the
kneecap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as the
batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball.”
After
the 84-page report’s release, baseball analyst Joe Sheehan
commented, “In 2000, there were no drug tests and 5,693 home runs. In 2017,
there were 10,237 drug tests and 6,105 home runs. Maybe it was never the drugs
after all.”
The
way it used to be, as 1920s-’30s sportswriter and columnist Heywood Broun wrote,
“ ‘Get up and hit a home run,' has never been a part of the usable technique of
any manager.”
Today,
it’s different. The odds are better that a homer could happen. But as we enjoy
home runs, may we forgive flawed assumptions from before and concede that
owners like the increased attention, attendance and revenues homers help
create.
Baseball(s)
been very, very good.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.