Bill Knight column for 1-9, 10 or 11, 2020
There’s a lot of bull out now, from
bull-in-the-china-shop foreign relations to the bullfighting approach to
domestic policies, as the “Matador in Chief” waves a cape of war before us as
he spears us in the back on Social Security.
January 31 is the deadline for
public comment on a mostly overlooked Trump proposal that could kill disability
benefits for thousands of American by complicating how the Social Security
Administration (SSA) decides folks’ eligibility. The rule change was published
as required in a November Federal Register.
The change – foreshadowed this
summer, when House Republicans introduced H.R. 3566, titled the “Social
Security Disability Insurance Return to Work Act” – would add an extra step to
an already-complex process.
People getting disability help currently
have ongoing reviews to see if they’re still eligible for help by classifying
them as “improvement not expected,” “improvement expected,” or “improvement
possible.” The Trump administration and some Republicans want to add “improvement
likely.”
That could threaten assistance to
4.4 million citizens, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Social Security advocates say the
move is intended to cut people’s benefits.
“Donald Trump and his advisers know
that this will kill people, and they do not care,” said Alex Lawson, director
of Social Security Works organization, which wants to protect the program. “Every
current and future Social Security beneficiary must band together to defeat
this horrific proposal, or else all of our earned benefits will be next.
“When Ronald Reagan implemented a
similar benefit cut, it ripped away the earned benefits of 200,000 people,”
Lawson added. “Ultimately, Reagan was forced to reverse his attack on Social
Security after massive public outcry – but not before people suffered and
died.”
Social Security is popular,
according to Pew Research, which shows 74% saying SS benefits shouldn’t be
reduced in any way.
In Illinois in 2017, the Census
says Social Security provided benefits to 2.2 million residents, who received
$34.9 billion in benefits, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis
reported; the average SS benefit here was $15,719, the SSA said; and the
program helped lift 729,670 Illinois residents out of poverty, according to the
Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
The percentage of people in
Illinois’ Congressional Districts receiving Social Security benefits ranges
from 11% to 22.9%, with the highest percentages downstate. Districts 15, 16, 17
and 18 all have more than 21.7% of their constituents getting benefits, SSA
said in May.
Trump in 2016 campaigned on
protecting Social Security, but its budget is down 9% in the last eight years,
and the SSA has 1,200 fewer employees despite increased workloads.
Separate from the federal budget,
Social Security itself isn’t funded by Congress (and therefore doesn’t add to
the nation’s budget deficits nor long-term debt), but Capitol Hill can limit
its administrative spending.
U.S. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.)
this summer told the New York Times that the GOP has discussed cutting Social
Security, and Trump said he was open to the idea.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell (R-Ky.) called for reductions to Social Security and Medicare after
passing the 2017 tax-cut fiasco; U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) in August
suggested lawmakers make cuts behind closed doors, according to the Cedar
Rapids Gazette; and Trump’s 2020 budget proposal asks for a $870 billion
decrease in Social Security and Medicare.
Illinois Congressman Danny Davis
and five other House Democrats asked to extend the proposal’s comment
period to March 16, criticizing the change
as “incredibly complex, potentially harmful,” costing $1.8 billion in the
coming decade, and adding to disability reviews’ “long and troubled history.”
Another SS advocacy group, the National
Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, issued a statement saying,
“The Trump/GOP tax cuts for the wealthy will add over $1.5 trillion in
debt. Now we know how they’ll pay for
those tax cuts: by cutting Social Security and Medicare.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.